On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:59:31 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Some quick thoughts: > > - OOC: Is gnupg1 going away, or what is the reason for this proposal? > I have asked about this, but nobody is really pushing for gnupg1 to > go away. However, it currently FTBFS, so lets see if it will be in > bullseye. I see, thank you. > > Alright, changes pushed to > > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libconfig-identity-perl.git > > but I wouldn't mind a second (yours or someone else's :)) pair of > > eyes before uploading. > Thanks for taking care of this. I didn't get to look at your changes > before the upload :-/ No worries, and thanks for checking now! (We can always do another upload if necessary :)) > The "save test data" machinery looks correct to me. Even though I > might have written the logic inverted - the double negation took me > me some time to understand. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's the way I'm used to do it - with the background to ensure that we get a(n early) true result for the evaluation in make context. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Kante: Ituri
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
