Control: severity -1 import On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 2:15 AM Andreas Henriksson <andr...@fatal.se> wrote: > > Hello! > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:03:39AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: golang-github-coreos-bbolt > > Version: 1.3.5-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el > > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > > Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > > on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64. > [...] > > > === RUN TestBucket_Stats > > > bucket_test.go:1222: unexpected BranchPageN: 0 > > > --- FAIL: TestBucket_Stats (9.56s) > [...] > > Apparently bbolt is a fork of boltdb, so please see my comments > on the equivalent bug report againt boltdb: > https://bugs.debian.org/976907 > > > Relevant part: > It seems the test-suite makes assumptions related to calculations that > involve os.Getpagesize() (which gives 4096 on amd64 and 65536 on > ppc64el, which is 16 times larger). > Changing the 500 number to 8000 (16 times larger) in > TestBucket_Stats(...) (in bucket_test.go:1143) gives the expected > BranchPageN == 1 .... (however after that it then says > "unexpected LeafPageN: 6" with this modification). > > In my opinion it's pretty clear that these are test-suite only > issues and not issues in the actual product. > > > I would thus personally just disable the test-suite on !amd64 if no > porter is interested in fixing the testsuite (unless we agree this > issue simply can be downgraded to non-RC).
I prefer to downgrade the severity. Just the test, not the library itself is broken. -- Shengjing Zhu
