On 09/12/20 at 11:18 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > severity 976947 minor > tags 976947 wontfix > thanks > > On 12/9/20 10:25 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > > on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64. > > > > I'm marking this bug as severity:serious since your package has only > > Architecture:all binary packages, and should thus, in theory, build > > everywhere. Failure to build on ppc64el might indicate a serious issue > > in this package or in another package. > > > > But feel free to downgrade or close if you believe that this is only a > > build-time issue. (I would personnally prefer a severity:minor bug just to > > track that the package can only be built on specific architectures.) > > The RC severity is not appropriate for theoretical issues. As long as > arch:all packages aren't actually built on non-x86 it is not a high > severity issue.
OK FYI, I confirmed that removing -march=native was enough to get the package to build (the test suite passes) on ppc64el. Lucas
