Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-12-06 12:08:29) > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 11:37, Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote: > > Sorry, I was unclear. Let me try rephrase to clarify: > > > > ftpmaster strongly dislikes (i.e. they will reject) too tiny source > > packages, but ftpmaster does not actively encourage (even if they > > might tolerate) duplicate code. > > > > My point was not that ftpmaster rejects duplicate code (they might > > in severe cases, but that is not really their task to judge on). > > > > My point was, instead, that it is wrong to interpret the fact that > > ftpmaster rejects tiny source packages as an endorsement of > > duplicate source through _repeated_ embedding of same module. > > "One line of code (=exaggeration for simple module) should be always > embedded independent of the number of packages that depend on it." - > Thorsten Alteholz / ftp master > > > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2018-September/027873.html
You provide a quote and share a link to its source, but do not elaborate what _you_ want to say by sharing that quote. What you quote, and the longer message by Thorsten, makes sense to me. If you are trying to prove that ftpmaster _do_ explicitly endorse duplicate source through _repeated_ embedding of same module, then where do they say it is ok and good and encouraged and endorsed to embed _same_ code _multiple_ times? "constant four = 2 + 2" should always be embedded - e.g. always embedded in src:node-sillymodules where it was provided as virtual package node-four. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature