Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Control: tag -1 confirmed On 12/2/20 9:30 PM, Jamie Heilman wrote: > > The only way to avoid the problem is to avoid having the > runit-systemd.postrm script from runit-systemd <= 2.1.2-36 run after > runit-run is installed. You could introduce a new version of a > more-or-less empty transition runit-systemd package that runit-run > depends on, to ensure a version of the runit-systemd.postrm script > that doesn't disable the unit exists prior to purge, it's just ugly > becuase sysvinit users would be forced into installing a package with > "systemd" in the name (even though it shouldn't depend on systemd) > which is going to cause confusion. The maintainer community will > hopefully have better advice that results in a cleaner transition. Thanks for the suggestion, i'll see what I can do
Lorenzo
