Source: debian-faq Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Several PDFs shipped in various debian-faq packages embed the build date: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/amd64/diffoscope-results/debian-faq.html /usr/share/doc/debian/FAQ/debian-faq.de.pdf.gz 2 5.·Januar·2022 2 3.·Dezember·2020 The attached patch fixes this by setting FORCE_SOURCE_DATE=1 in debian/rules, which texlive needs in order to respect SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, which is set during debian package builds to the timestamp in the latest debian/changelog entry. https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/source-date-epoch/ live well, vagrant
From 7176b957c5e7d3adaa539ac9f9eb70285ad7ccea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@reproducible-builds.org> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 19:20:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] debian/rules: Set FORCE_SOURCE_DATE=1 in order for texlive to respect SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for reproducible timestamps. https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/source-date-epoch/ --- debian/rules | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 64bb6b8..f3f359d 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f +# Needed for texlive to respect SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH when setting date +export FORCE_SOURCE_DATE=1 + %: dh $@ -- 2.29.2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
