Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-12-03 18:07:56) > > > On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 3 10:03:18 PM IST, Xavier <y...@debian.org> wrote: > >I'm not in favor of your proposal: if I need a node-very-few-module > >which is provided by a package with many dependencies, I'm not happy to > >depend on it. To apply that, we should then choose with precaution in > >which package we will embed each code. Packaging JS is already a hudge > >work, I'm not sure we need more complexity. > > > >@JS-Team, does anyone have any other opinion? Else which option do you > >choose? I'll update pkg-js-tools with your choice of course. > > I agree with yadd here. We should not complicate js packaging more than it > already is.
Rubbish: This debate is not about more or less complicated packaging. We should make our js packaging *less* complicated. More importantly, we should make js *maintenance* less complicated! But most importantly, we should obey all "should"s in Debian policy: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#embedded-code-copies - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
