Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-03 13:09:29) > Quoting Sylvestre Ledru (2020-11-28 20:08:51) > > > > Le 28/11/2020 à 19:57, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > Package: llvm-11 > > > Version: 1:11.0.0-5+b1 > > > Severity: normal > > > Seems to me that - - the least invasive solution is to have > > > LLVM 11 > > > > > is your sentence finished ? :) > > Whoops, simply editorial noise I forgot to delete - please ignore :-) > > > > > Assuming my understanding of the above is correct, the least > > > invasive solution seems to be to have llvm-11 cherry-pick the LLVM > > > patch to handle this "emscripten EH functions" renaming: > > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3bba91f64eef15956f589fa446c265a714cc7893 > > > > I am not super excited to take a patch that big, esp for bullseye.
I understand the concern over maintaining large patches in general, but does that general concern really apply here specifically? Do the code functions directly affected by the patch currently work? Do they even have any use except together with emscripten? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
