On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 04:36:06PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >... > > I'm not sure what .depends ~ "~" is supposed to catch here and it causes > > a parser failure. So I've merged this ben file with the one from the > > llvm-defaults 9 transition. Once the tracker is available, please check > > if that looks sane. > > Please remove the second part from the Affected, these packages are not > part of the llvm-defaults transition.
I've rebuilt the 13 bad packages from the ben file below: ccls OK clazy OK codelite OK faust OK ghdl FTBFS #976233 ldc OK libclang-perl OK qttools-opensource-src OK sparse OK ycmd OK kdevelop OK qtcreator OK gnome-builder OK This is not a normal transition where old package(s) disappear from testing since both LLVM 9 and LLVM 11 are already in testing and will stay in testing after this transition. This means rebuilds could be scheduled at any time after an llvm-defaults upload without actual conflict with other transitions. Removal of LLVM 9 and/or LLVM 10 from bullseye are topics unrelated to this llvm-defaults transition. cu Adrian title = "llvm-defaults 11"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ /\b(libclang|liblldb|llvm)-dev\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?11\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?9\b/;
