Yes, I make a point of not caring to read through emails that are clearly
inflammatory and tendentious. It's well documented how to contribute to
Debian, including uploads of new packages; start observing some minimal
standards of acceptable behavior or stop wasting everyone's time.


On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:47:35AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> seems do you not read the mails, several issues are solved upstream,
> but still are happened cos there's no new release. (not so difficult
> to make it)
> 
> same for courier, several bug reports are not taken in consideration
> (solved of course) and now today make a separate package for maildrop
> is nonsense cos is part of courier-mta suite.. it belongs to that
> suite, but upstream committed some of the requested features
> 
> El jue, 26 de nov. de 2020 a la(s) 07:56, Josip Rodin
> (j...@debbugs.entuzijast.net) escribió:
> >
> >
> > Why are you posting these agitated bug reports? Can I suggest that you first
> > calm down and try to compose your thoughts, and then put that in writing
> > while bearing in mind that an assumption of good faith is the only proper
> > way to operate?
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:08:21AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> > > Package: maildrop
> > > Version: 2.9.3-2
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > The maildrop package in debian is severely out of sync and outdated:
> > >
> > > First of all stop of "Upstream is not willing to add another feature",
> > > seems people dont understan maildrop are made for courier, and if need
> > > can proposed a fork for that!
> > >
> > > Second: **several problems where aborted upstream**, the most
> > > important ones are:
> > > * libs/maildrop/deliver.C (delivery): Always return 75 upon
> > > delivery failure, for the standalone maildrop build. related to #481223
> > > * libs/maildir/maildirmake.c (main): maildirmake's -q option
> > > will create the maildir if it does not exist. related to #501557
> > > * libs/rfc2045/reformime.c (main2): Fix crash when the -s option is
> > > not valid. related to #71625
> > > * rfc2045/reformime.c (main2): fix crash if -x or -X is specified
> > > without the corresponding -s option. related to #71625
> > >
> > > A new maildrop pack is required and this must either come from the
> > > same courier sources (#867121) or update the one... this last seems
> > > quite stupid as courier is the official sources of maildrop and
> > > although it is offered separately by the author upstream, unifying it
> > > will improve maintenance from a team, and as you guys notice lack of
> > > interest/avaliable time in the courier suite (reading the last
> > > changelog, seems changes are more to complain with debian package
> > > policy that is innecesary respect real issues)
> > >
> > > ... and as far as I can see you are looking for the sources in sf
> > > instead of the right place which is the courier oficial download page,
> > > additional while the courier-mta sources are up to date in
> > > salsa-debian, the maildrop one in salsa-debian are too old respect the
> > > mta suite!
> > >
> > > while I made my own package on OBS vegnuli home for Devuan and Debian,
> > > is you guys need help i'm a often user of the complete suite and not
> > > just parts or toys of, maildrop can be build with two ways:
> > >  * set GID mail without restricted caller (maildrop)
> > >  * set UID root with restricted caller for courier-mta
> > >    (maildrop-courier) -- missing and the way i set in my package cos
> > > is the need by the original suite the courier-mta
> > >
> > >
> > > NOTE: Courier maildrop in debian present a very not proper behaviour..
> > > original sources are from courier and any other implementation are
> > > non-related and users can fork the software, cases like #375589 are
> > > not valid cos seems maildrop (as author make it for courier filtering)
> > > is a courier implementation if applies! so any external specific usage
> > > are purely optional
> > >
> > > This are related to #910380 (separate makemime from sources) #204187,
> > > #596057 & #375589#26 (bad usage  cos is not made for), #481223
> > > (changed behaviour cos is not made for, what?), #592585 (dovecot
> > > specific crap) and go and go.. seems people thinks that maildrop are
> > > made for others rather than the courier suite... funny please close
> > > all of those package cos seems many of them are not supported by
> > > upstream and community must make a fork in those several cases!
> > >
> > > Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> > > http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
> >
> > --
> > Josip Rodin

-- 
Josip Rodin

Reply via email to