Rogério Brito wrote: > On Apr 14 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote: >> On 4/14/06, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Oh, and just for fun (and as an extra point of information), I >>> downloaded the jar file for 2.4.0.2 from upstream and renamed it to >>> ~/.azureus/Azureus2.jar and this is the only non-freely compiled thing >>> that I'm using at the moment. >> It's still not super-simple. > > Indeed, I think that I spoke too soon: I had Azureus 2.4.0.2 up, but the > connections to other peers were always dying (with null pointer > exceptions).
Which gij version did you use? I've seen that problem with gij-4.0, but for me it worked with gij-4.1. > > Moving the jar file out of the way didn't seem to change that. :-( > >> Azureus does currently run using GIJ, which I think is great (!), > > Are you able to correctly use Azureus with gij, without any serious > flaws? > Yes. Philipp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
