20.10 is still in beta, so it shouldn't be candidate for bullseye. But if they release the stable version before bullseye freeze, maybe we should update.
Regarding cgroupv2, systemd maintainer has proposed to switch to cgroupv2 by default 1year ago. Please see #943981. It seems docker is the only blocker now. // send from my mobile device El boulangero <elboulang...@gmail.com> 于 2020年11月19日周四 11:24写道： > Hi Shengjing, > > thanks for the message. I agree that we should start packaging docker > 20.10.x in experimental. > > Regarding docker 19.03.x: do you know if it will work at all in bullseye? > Right now it works for me, running Debian unstable. I guess it's because > both cgroup interfaces are available: > > $ grep cgroup /proc/filesystems > nodev cgroup > nodev cgroup2 > > Do you know if Bullseye will ship with both cgroup? Hence docker 19.03.x > will work? > > Personally I would be in favor of sticking to the Docker branch 19.03 for > bullseye, rather than shipping a beta that will then never be updated to > later point releases, due to Debian policy for the stable suite. > > > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 11:09 PM Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Package: docker.io >> Version: 19.03.13+dfsg1-3 >> Severity: wishlist >> X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org >> >> Hi, >> >> docker has released 20.10.0-beta1 for a while. Not sure the plan for >> stable >> release. >> >> But if we want 20.10 in bullseye, I suggest starting to package >> 20.10.0-beta1 >> and upload to experimental. So people have time to test. >> >> A big improvement in 20.10 is supporting cgroupv2. >> >> https://github.com/docker/docker-ce/blob/master/VERSION >> https://github.com/moby/moby/releases/tag/v20.10.0-beta1 >> https://github.com/docker/docker-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md >> >
