On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 10:10:10PM +0900, Kentaro Hayashi wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:33:54 +0200 Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> wrote: > snip > > Not always. Sometimes that points to packages that are missing in Debian > > and should be packaged. > > I've missed this point of view. > > > But as soon as a single system report a package name, it appears in the > > statistics. So unless everyone set up popcon to discard it, there is the > > same amount of noise with less accurate statistics. > > As you mentioned, it may be meaningless unless everyone set up popcon > to discard it. > So, to make statistics accurately, it may be a bad idea to filter them.
Thanks for getting back to us! So how about the proposal to use a dpkg field to identify packages than need filtering ? Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
