HI Stéphane, On 02-11-2020 16:56, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> autopkgtest for ocaml-cairo2/0.6.1+dfsg-5: amd64: Regression ♻ (reference >> ♻), arm64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), >> i386: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: Regression ♻ (reference ♻) > > However, I don't understand why it complains about > ocaml-cairo2/0.6.1+dfsg-5 whereas version 0.6.1+dfsg-6 is fixed. Does > something need to be done?
Your symptoms describe a missing *versioned* Depends/Breaks or test dependency. The migration software tries run tests with the minimum changes. So, if nothing makes sure that the version from unstable is needed, it will run with as much packages as possible from testing. What we see in the logs is that it installs the test suite from testing. Then, the test dependencies are installed and apt-get reports that it can't install the required packages. It then falls back to enable everything from unstable and then installation is possible. Do you confirm that the issue is only in the test? I think we can ignore this issue then (or better, trigger the test manually with ocaml-cairo2 from unstable. With the description above, do you understand why the relations in the packages don't teach our migration software what to do? Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
