Package: mingw-w64-common Version: 8.0.0-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer,
When cross compiling for 32-bit Windows, I noticed that some translation units had a different value for std::max_align_t than others. It appears that (for some reason), one included it from: /usr/share/mingw-w64/include/stddef.h and another from: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/10-posix/include/stddef.h These have conflicting definitions, see http://paste.debian.net/1169371/ According to people on #gcc IRC: <redi> the issue seems to be that one of your stddef headers is old and predates the addition of __float128 support, which required increasing the alignment of max_align_t If this is true, then something is wrong with the stddef.h in mingw-w64-common, as it doesn't include that __float128 support. (But I wonder in the first place why both mingw-w64-common and gcc-mingw-w64-i686-posix provide a stddef.h, which apparently both can be found and then have a different definition...!?) Anyway, this is all not my specialism, but I think it's still important to report it. Please let me know if you need more information. I'll do my best to provide it. Thanks for taking a look at this! Kind regards, Manuel -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -- no debconf information
