Quoting Laurent Bonnaud (2020-10-29 17:49:04) > On 10/29/20 4:30 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Please elaborate: What_is_ the issue? > > It is my understanding that packages should not create obsolete > conffiles. That's what I understood when reading this: > > https://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/10/07/the-right-way-to-remove-an-obsolete-conffile-in-a-debian-package/
Thanks for the additional information - that helps. I agree that packages should cleanup conffiles no longer included with the package (assuming that's what you mean by "should not create obsolete conffiles"). I fail to recognize, however, that fonts-noto-core fails to such cleanup. The command you share the output of indicates that you feel that the conffile /etc/fonts/conf.avail/30-droid-noto.conf is the one that is not cleaned up, and you reported this issue against version 20181227-1 of fonts-noto-core. Did you have fonts-noto-core 20181227-1 installed, or installed and then removed, or installed and then purged, when you ran that command? Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
