Package: scons Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: calumlikesapple...@gmail.com It is my understanding that documentation pacakges are typically linked to the packages they document by a Suggests: or a Reccomends:, however, that is not the case for scons-doc. Thus, a potential user would'nt be informed about the existence of such a package unless they went out of their way to find it.
I think scons-doc should be reccomended by scons, because it is a build system, and so which most users would probably want to consult the documentation on it eventually. Thanks for your time! -Calum -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages scons depends on: ii python3 3.8.2-3 scons recommends no packages. scons suggests no packages.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
