On 2020-10-19, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> The FTP team revised their guidance related to OpenSSL linkage. It is
> now considered a "system library", so it is now allowed to dynamically
> link a GPL binary to libssl:
>
> http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ftp/2020/debian-ftp.2020-03-13-20.02.html
> https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/website/-/merge_requests/6
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972181

Wow, this is a big surprise!

Now we seem to have the absence of documentation about the issue, which
seems a bit odd... given that this has been an issue in Debian for so
long.


> Please consider removing the override of CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE in
> debian/rules to get signature supports in u-boot tools.
>
> MR opened on Salsa:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/u-boot/-/merge_requests/14

Thanks for the proposed update!


Because the system library exception for GPL+openssl seems like a
strange workaround to me... I did give a short attempt at switching
u-boot over to wolfssl using the openssl compatibility layer, though it
still needs a bit too much work to make the change at this point.


Eventually I'll probably just merge your proposed changes...


live well,
  vagrant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to