Ben Hutchings wrote: > You misunderstand me. I meant that if apt-proxy does not have > permission to write to the cache dir, serving files without caching them > is the best it can do.
Ah, sure, I agree, apt-proxy's behaviour is not bad, I'm quite happy with apt-proxy doing that. The point of this bug report is that the package installation scripts need to be fixed so that apt-proxy functions correctly after installation. Now I'm confused about what you're trying to tell me about how this should be fixed. Could you rephrase please? -- Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mob +64 21 611 544 www.mattb.net.nz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
