On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:05:31PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > This would be an extra set of packages (e.g. libarpack2-64-dev, > libarpack2-64) providing libarpack64.so (or libarpack-64.so) alongside > libarpack.so (i.e. coinstallable). It would be built against > libblas64-dev instead of libblas-dev.
Maybe libarpack64-2-dev? The "64" is a part of SONAME. e.g. the packages libblas64-dev, libblas64-3 are not named as something like libblas3-64-dev and libblas3-64. Plus, our convension is that the last number denotes the SOVERSION, right? And do we mean SOVERSION=64 by libarpack2-64 (which I think definitely not).
