> Only thing I could find was this blog entry: > https://neilmadden.blog/2019/12/30/a-few-comments-on-age/ > > (After that I'm not really sure if age is ready for Debian…) >
Filippo Valsorda replied to this post [^1] and while I’m not a security expert at all, I feel the main issue is not on age’s robustness, but more on what it should do or not do as a tool (e.g. providing sender authentication). > Are there other reviews on age? I’m not aware of any reviews/audit on age’s encryption. [^1]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/age-dev/r-gwwcN3L-0/EhEvUbG5AwAJ -- Johan Fleury
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
