On 9/21/20 5:16 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 9/21/20 5:10 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:44:06PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> But SIP 6 won't be released before Qt 6, which is expected in the beginning >>>> of 2021. >>> >>> Are there any packagers for Qt 6 yet? If not, we'll have qt5 in Debian >>> for quite awhile still. >> >> SIP doesn't depend on Qt, just the upstream SIP/PyQt6 developer wants >> to coordinate his release schedule with Qt. >> >>> Your patches to the upstream buildsystem have been been added to the >>> master branch on salsa as well. They will be included in the next upload >>> which likely won't happen before 3.10.10+dfsg-1 migrates to testing, at >>> the latest when 3.10.11 is released next month. >>> >>> Once PyQt5 is moved to unstable, the changes for (build) dependencies >>> will be adopted on the master branch as well. >> >> Can I ask you to test the current QGIS package from unstable with PyQt5 >> 5.15.1 from experimental? >> >> I could do it myself, but you know this package more so can probably perform >> more extensive testing. > > We've already tested that it builds as proven by the package in > experimental. > > I don't use QGIS much, so there is not much runtime testing I can do.
A quick test in an unstable VMs doesn't turn up any issues, adding an OSM standard layer and a BAG woonplaats WMS layer worked successfully. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
