tags 926321 moreinfo thanks On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 10:10:57AM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:06:08PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote: > > Source: openafs > > Version: 1.6.20-2+deb9u2 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch, ftbfs, stretch > > > > It would be nice if openafs were to be available on ARM64 architecture > > in Debian Stretch and Ubuntu Bionic. > > > > The OpenStack Infrastructure project in particular would benefit from > > this package suite being available. > > Thanks for the report (and patch). > > I think I remember it being a conscious decision around the time of > upstream's 1.8.0 to only bring arm64 support into Debian alongside 1.8.0 > (i.e., for buster), and I thought that's because upstream had needed more > changes than just the sort you have in these patches. But presumably your > systems are working with just the posted patches, so I'll try to take a > closer look at what actually happened with upstream and refresh my memory > of the situation. > > That said, I don't know how the SRMs feel about this sort of change. > Did you consider using a backported 1.8.2-1 from buster? (I don't have > much time for working on the Ubuntu packaging; > https://launchpad.net/~openafs/+archive/ubuntu/stable?field.series_filter=zesty > may be an option for you there.)
Hi Paul, Did you manage to resolve the situation here in some way? I fear that the passage of time may have overtaken events, here... Thanks, Ben
