Hello, I'm sorry I just realized. I didn't realize that the control: reassign -1 wnpp emails were being sent manually by people. I thought that was part of the softare.
For future I'll file all ITPs and RFSs against wnpp. Thank you for the help! Regards Cocoa (She/Her) August 22, 2020 7:03 PM, "Andrei POPESCU" <andreimpope...@gmail.com> wrote: > Control: reassign -1 wnpp > > On Vi, 21 aug 20, 12:14:00, Cocoa wrote: > >> package: ruby-proc-to-ast >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: 'Cocoa'<cocoa1...@disroot.org> >> >> *Package Name : ruby-proc-to-ast >> Version : 0.1.0-1 >> Upstream Author : joker1007 >> *URL : https://github.com/joker1007/proc_to_ast >> *License : MIT >> *Description : Convert Proc object to AST::Node > > Hello, > > ITP bugs must be reported against the 'wnpp' package since the package > to be introduced doesn't exist (yet) and several tools are expecting > ITPs to be reported against 'wnpp'. > > See https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for more details. > > Kind regards, > Andrei > -- > Looking after bugs assigned to unknown packages
