On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:59:29PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > Hi People,
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:07:30PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > After some discussion w/ Steve Langasek regarding the issues which exist > > w/ OpenLDAP 2.1 he had this suggestion: > What are the major issues BTW!? I think 2.1.30 is mostly unusable > because of the data loss issues and broken TLS support. > > OpenLDAP 2.2 produces (2.2.x): > > slapd > > ldap-utils > > libldap-evil-lemurs (used only by slapd && ldap-utils) > > libslapd2-dev (never been *really* supported, and still not) > > > > OpenLDAP 2 produces (2.1.x): > > libldap2 > > libldap2-dev (using libldap2) > Good idea. I'd rather call it libldap2.2 and omit the -dev package for > now to stop people from using it for their packages. If the lib package name doesn't match the actual soname used by the library, then all possible names are equally bad, FWIW. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
