On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:32:44 +0200, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > On 8/4/20 10:08 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 at 20:56:46 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:24:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> > >> wrote: > >>> I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and > >>> uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437. > >> > >> Except not, because I forgot to update my key in the keyring and it’s > >> expired. Ho hum... > > > > It would have collided with Matthias Klose's NMU anyway, except that > > doesn't seem to have made it into the archive either for some reason > > (possibly *because* they collided). > > a .2 upload was accepted. maybe .1 was silently rejected because it sits in > the delayed queue ... > > > Dropping libglade-convert (which is even more obsolete than the rest of > > the package, and that's really saying something) seems like a better > > solution than using python2. > > Could you follow-up with that, once the current package is in testing?
Yes, I’ll take care of it (along with the maintainer fix-ups). Regards, Stephen
pgpM0jnwYCuxN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
