Quoting Vagrant Cascadian (2020-07-20 22:05:43) > On 2020-07-19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Patch is still needed, and I have now updated it upstream: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200719135632.681954-2...@jones.dk/ > > This link gets both patches: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=190758&state=*
Ah, that's helpful! > It looks like they've gotten a few reviews already, and presuming no > objections surface, I could apply them in the next u-boot 2020.07 > upload, and hopefully will be applied upstream for 2020.10. Thanks. > > The newest upstream patch is larger, because developers requested I > > do a more general change, where earlier proposed patches generalized > > only across sunxi devices. > > > > There should be no functional difference between the older more > > minimal patches and the newer one, and I therefore propose to apply > > the older one for Buster. > > The wip-teres-i-keyboard branch on salsa? Yes. > That includes a bunch of changes for platforms (unifier) that we don't > support. If you prefer a shorter patch with those plastforms being broken, then indeed I can reduce it. > I think could probably be trimmed down to a more minimal patch. e.g. > It doesn't look like CONFIG_USE_PREBOOT is needed at all; I *think* > you could just use CONFIG_PREBOOT without adding Kconfig support > (needs testing) and then use ifdef/ifndef directly where the preboot > command is added. Sorry, I don't follow how you think it could be done without per-board definitions. > I'd normally be hesitant to add non-upstreamed patches, and will want > to wait to see how that plays out, but once the functionality lands in > experimental or unstable, I'd be willing to consider a more minimal > patch for buster. Thanks. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
