On 7/11/20 11:25 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sat 11 Jul 2020 at 08:37PM +02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Could you confirm this issue is not likely to get fixed anytime soon?
>>
>> 3.10.7+dfsg-1~exp1 FTBFS on eberlin, and 3.10.7+dfsg-1 FTBFS on
>> mipsel-manda-02, both had the same issue: "Error: branch out of range".
>>
>> 3.10.7+dfsg-1 was given back because it was part of the qt transition
>> and succeeded on mipsel-aql-01.
>>
>> I expect a subsequent binNMU or new upload to FTBFS again, so removing
>> qgis from mipsel is still a good idea in my opinion.
>>
>> If we're lucky mips* may not meet the architecture qualifications and be
>> removed for bullseye and this qgis not alway building successfully there
>> will become moot.
> 
> So, you'd say that the successful build was a random success, and it
> *usually* fails?  To be honest it seems odd to me remove something based
> on a random failure, but if it is much more often than not and you think
> the upstream issue is unlikely to get fixed soon, I will trust your
> judgement.

The removal was requested to not block the qt transition.

To be blunt, I have zero faith that the mips* architectures will become
first class citizens able to build complex packages like qgis & mapnik
like the other architectures any time soon.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to