Hi Felix, Felix Lechner wrote: > In Debian patches, only check the DEP-3 header for legacy encoding. > (Closes: #964281)
Yay, thanks! > Splits Debian patches into parts and only checks patch headers for > legacy encodings. Thank you to Axel Becker for that excellent idea. Thanks for the praise. Unfortunately with a missing character in my family name. :-/ (But yeah, it's a common typo and I'm used to it.) > Thanks to Axel Beckert for his patience and the generosity of his time > in reporting the oversight. Oh, I considered it just a normal bug report with ideas how to maybe fix it. :-) > It ended up being a fun and easy fix. Cool! > As a side note, the bug reporter's statement about upstream files was > not fully accurate. The check never looked at upstream files. Ah, sorry. I was aware of this, because the file name which was reported and the file which needed to be patched had different file suffixes (*.src vs *.wml). I just mentioned "upstream" to explain the reason for the need to patch instead of just editing the files. > This commit has a potential to disturb the release process. Huh? > Since building is broken in unstable, the package was built and > examined with Lintian in a testing chroot. Ah, this probably also explains why https://lintian.debian.org/tags.html misses some of the new tags. I searched for "breakout-link" in it for a reference to upstream several times the past few days. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
