* Christoph Berg: > Re: Florian Weimer >> WolfSSL is licensed under the GPL, version 2 only. This means that >> applications which use libpq and whose license is incompatible with >> the GPL now violate the license of WolfSSL. Furthermore, the original >> GPL compatibility problem is only addressed for programs which are >> licensed under the GPLv2. The problem remains for programs licensed >> under the GPLv3 (in fact, the problem is more severe because it cannot >> be argued that WolfSSL gives implied permission to indirect linking >> via libpq, unlike direct users of libpq). > > Looking into the wolfSSL source, it's actually GPL 2+.
<https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/blob/master/LICENSING> says this: | wolfSSL (formerly known as CyaSSL) and wolfCrypt are either licensed | for use under the GPLv2 or a standard commercial license. For our | users who cannot use wolfSSL under GPLv2, a commercial license to | wolfSSL and wolfCrypt is available. Please contact wolfSSL | Inc. directly at: | | Email: licens...@wolfssl.com | Phone: +1 425 245-8247 | | More information can be found on the wolfSSL website at www.wolfssl.com. Sadly, upstream refused to clarify this <https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/issues/2171> At this point, I have no idea what the actual intent is.
