> Dave Steele <dste...@gmail.com> hat am 22.06.2020 20:29 geschrieben: > > If I can interpret, it sounds like there are two options on the table - > something looking like > https://salsa.debian.org/reportbug-team/reportbug/-/merge_requests/24, > or a reportbug-ng port. The MR needs, at a minimum, elimination > of the version option, and clarity in the documentation re supported > and unsupported MUAs. More complete attachment support would be gravy. > > Eliminating the concept of the MUA from reportbug would be attractive. > Require xdg support?
While the current MUA concept in reportbug is limited, I don't want to break the parts that are actually working. This stuff needs to keep working even in text-only environments, so xdg support can only be added as a new option. That's also why I think there is value in a custom mua option outside xdg. I agree that adding an xdg-email option as a first step is likely to cover the most common case and will be a huge improvement already. Custom mua support can be the next step.
