On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 at 14:20:47 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> A patch with the required changes is attached for your consideration.

Thanks, I'll apply this.

> The test attempts to detect whether systemd is available by testing for
> /run/systemd. However, this path can exist on non-systemd systems.

This seems somewhat least-astonishment-violating... is this because
elogind is pretending to be systemd-logind, and needs to create other
directories there to emulate systemd-logind's "filesystem API"?

    smcv

Reply via email to