Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately you forgot to provide information about how the proper
> solutions should look like. Almost all that changes solve real problems
> documented in the BTS, and the changelog file tells you the numbers of
> the bug reports. Please explain how we should solve that problems
> (existing IRL) in a proper way without offending our users and kernel
> developers.
If you did read my information, you would find that the named patches
_create_ problems.
Even in the most unlikely case that that also fixed problems (which does not
seem to be documented), it does not make sense to replace one problem
by another one.
> > 23_o_excl.dpatch Causes libscg to fail and is the reason
> > for 3 bugs in the cdrtools Debuan bug
> > list.
> ...
> > 36_ATA_scanbus_ignore_locked.dpatch See 23_o_excl
>
> Yes, it solves that problem. The alternative would be a fundamental
> change of libscg which you would unlikely agree with.
If you did read the bug list from Debian, you would see that the patches above
cause cdrecord to fail completely while an unpatched version works at the same
time.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
