> > Please, could you support kfreebsd-amd64 similarly > > as kfreebsd-i386 in Build-Depends and in debian/rules. > > As this grows to more and more architectures, I suggest you push for a > macro of "!kfreebsd" for build-depends, so we can do this in a more > organised manner. Or (what may be better) a set of macros like: klinux, > khurd, kfreebsd. Otherwise, we're going to be sprouting huge control > lines with !kfreebsd-em64t !hurd-amd64 !hurd-mips, etc, with a > correspondingly large number of FTBFS bugs as each kernel is ported to a > new architecture. For example, Build-Depends: libselinux1-dev [klinux]
I fully agree, there is already limited support since dpkg 1.13.12: "* Add support for architecture wildcards, but for now they will only be exposed in debian/control files, not in binary nor source packages. Closes: #291939" The line will be "Build-Depends: libselinux1-dev [linux-any]" But this is not supported in sarge dpkg, so backports would not be possible. Also build-essential depends only on dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.5). > Will be fixed as you requested in the next upload. Many thanks. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
