On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 14:37 +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:31:46 -0700 Mattia Dongili <malat...@linux.it> > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:14:13PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:20:34AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > > ... > > > > Let's see where I get to in integrating the UML build with > > > > src:linux, > > > > ... > … > > I am taking a look at this. But before going any further, Ritesh, > would > you be willing to taking care of UML within src:linux ? > If yes, I hope* to send a MR the next week. >
Yes. It'd be ideal to have it there. But I have never looked at building the binary that way. Since I took maintenance of the package, I only targeted to keep it up-to-date. And given that it is built from the same Debian Linux source package, there's nothing else to worry for, in terms of patches and security fixes. The immediate benefit I see with UML being built with the rest of the linux packages, is that on every new update/upload of Linux, UML will be generated. Currently, that is not the case, when it is built independently. > Cheers, > > -- Santiago > > * But considering current conditions, this could take a little bit > longer. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
