More from debian-sparc:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> I don't have any trouble with sparc64 architecture, only with 2.6 and=20
>> sparc32 :-( Maybe this bug come from the same location than the bug I=20
>> have submitted in bugzilla.kernel.org (#6344)... DMA mistake that only=20
>> occurs with heavy disk I/O...
>>=20
>> Regards,
>>=20
>> JKB
>>=20
>>=20
>
>We have found that some systems are fine with later 2.6 kernels (say, in
>the 2.6.15 series) and some are not. sparc32 systems are a problem;
>U1/U2 systems routinely "crash under heavy disk I/O", U60 now seem fine,
>SB1000 is fine, I think U5/U10 are OK, and so on.
>
>Regards,
>--=20
>Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
>
>
>--=-QARA11RsenotYRfWKmne
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
>Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQBENlGbQa6M3+I///cRAn7JAKDHnuCiCeAsAO0RSa8TO5KDbtpisACgsBSu
>8r6z2AWjqvOgxdDo3HRyKoQ=
>=kebp
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>--=-QARA11RsenotYRfWKmne--
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
