If you can re-upload the package, I can give it a quick trip through New. Scott K
On May 18, 2020 3:17:26 PM UTC, Mattias Ellert <mattias.ell...@physics.uu.se> wrote: >> This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there >is >> a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by >mailing >> ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. > >Hi FTP masters. > >Sorry, but What I tried to request from you was not what happened. >Possibly, my request was not clear. > >My request was to remove the BINARY package gfal2 built for arm64, not >all binary packages built for arm64 from the SOURCE package gfal2. > >As far as I could tell from the description of the "NBS" tag, I was >supposed to list binary packages in the request... > >Before this change was done the 2.17.3-1 version of gfal2 was built for >all architectures, including arm64. And I had no intent to request the >removal of any of those. They were all good. Including the arm64 >versions. > >The problem was that in addition to this, unstable also contains a very >old 2.6.8-1 version for arm64. It was this version I wanted to have >removed. > >Before you did your change, only the gfal2 binary package from this old >arm64 build was visible. The reason being that the new build did not >provide an arch specific arm64 gfal2 binary package, since this package >is arch independent in the current version. > >Now that you have removed the current version of all the arm64 binary >packages, the really really old 2.6.8-1 became the "current" version >for arm64 for all binary packages. > >So now, not only the gfal2 binary package for arm64 (which was the one >I wanted to remove, but it is still there) is at version 2.6.8-1 - but >all binary packages built from the gfal2 source package is at this >version for arm64. So your interpretation of my request made the >problem worse rather than fixing it. > >To recover - remove the 2.6.8-1 version that is now "current" for >arm64, then put back the 2.17.3-1 version that was removed in error. > > Mattias > > >sön 2020-05-17 klockan 05:07 +0000 skrev Debian FTP Masters: >> We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following >> package(s) have been removed from unstable: >> >> gfal2-plugin-dcap | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> gfal2-plugin-file | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> gfal2-plugin-gridftp | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> gfal2-plugin-http | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> gfal2-plugin-mock | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> gfal2-plugin-sftp | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> gfal2-plugin-srm | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> libgfal-transfer2 | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> libgfal2-2 | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> libgfal2-dev | 2.17.3-1 | arm64 >> >> ------------------- Reason ------------------- >> ROM; NBS >> ---------------------------------------------- >> >> Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag >> database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a >bug. >> The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite >> references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references >> it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the >> master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next >> dinstall run at the earliest. >> >> Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks >> unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed >> from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency >> problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is >> really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. >> >> Bugs which have been reported against this package are not >automatically >> removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and >> close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed >package >> was superseded by another one. >> >> The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal >> can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. >> >> Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you >> have further comments please address them to 960...@bugs.debian.org. >> >> The full log for this bug can be viewed at >https://bugs.debian.org/960649 >> >> This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there >is >> a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by >mailing >> ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. >> >> Debian distribution maintenance software >> pp. >> Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
