Control: tags 954182 pending

dann frazier wrote...

> The description for clevis-initramfs appears to be incorrect.
> It says "Dracut integration for initramfs" - but it has nothing to do
> with Dracut AFAICT. I've proposed some clearer wording below, and
> adjusted the clevis-dracut description just to follow the same pattern.

Thanks for catching this, now applied.

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to