Hi Abou, On 08-05-2020 22:32, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Creating a source dependency between a general purpose (bindings) > library and an IDE is wrong in my sens.
Although I share your feeling, about it being weird, I don't see the harm. But... > So I'd propose that we keep them separate sources and update the import > scripts so that the Lazarus sources get discarded upon repackaging sources. I can live with that. By the way, most of the time we don't need import scripts as uscan can nowadays do that for us via Files-Excluded in d/copyright. > For the versioning, we can increase the epoch number and use the same > version as Lazarus. >> What do you think? In line with the policy, I don't like bumping epoch. At least you have to discuss on debian-devel before proceeding. I suggest we keep a +<real> version number until lazarus is at 2.6. That won't be too long and avoids have the epoch. Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
