Hi Josch, thanks for bringing this to my attention. It seems as if I have overseen Otto's bug report wen it came in two weeks ago. (Sorry, Otto.)
Johannes Schauer wrote: > Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > I am pretty sure this is related to the recent equivs 2.3.0 release, > > but I have not figured out the details yet. Some things have changed slightly in equivs and might need adaptions in scripts using them where they make assumptions never guaranteed and now no more true, like that only a .deb file is produced. E.g. now it also produces .changes and .buildinfo files, see e.g. https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/154 > bisection finished successfully > last good timestamp: 2020-04-19 06:52:31.476563+02:00 > first bad timestamp: 2020-04-19 10:35:09.156250+02:00 > only one package differs: equivs is the culprit Yeah, but we know that already. I still haven't understood what exactly causes this issue. If it's similar as with mk-ci-build-deps above, this is likely a bug in mk-build-deps then, just triggered by equivs. > Notice that the test-command executes equivs-build with one of the provided > examples (webserver.ctl), so the problem is not mk-build-deps specific. Ok, will have a look at this closer. > I wrote an autopkgtest which also demonstrates the problem: > > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/equivs/-/merge_requests/5 Will likely merge it once I've understood the cause of issue. Thanks for the test! Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
