Hi Lucas, On 26-04-2020 15:14, James McCoy wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:09:35PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> I >> suggest you apply the same fix you already did here [2] and stop >> building the python package for now if that works. > > Done and uploaded, however that now makes mercurial FTBFS, as I had > notified them earlier this month (#956007). I've now raised that bug to > serious.
According to dak, ruby2.5 can now be removed. Can you proceed and request it's removal from unstable? Paul elbrus@coccia:~$ dak rm --no-action -R --suite testing ruby2.5 Will remove the following packages from testing: libruby2.5 | 2.5.7-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x ruby2.5 | 2.5.7-1 | source ruby2.5 | 2.5.7-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x ruby2.5-dev | 2.5.7-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x ruby2.5-doc | 2.5.7-1 | all Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team <pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> ------------------- Reason ------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. elbrus@coccia:~$ dak rm --no-action -R ruby2.5 Will remove the following packages from unstable: libruby2.5 | 2.5.7-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x ruby2.5 | 2.5.7-1 | source ruby2.5 | 2.5.7-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x ruby2.5-dev | 2.5.7-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x ruby2.5-doc | 2.5.7-1 | all Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team <pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> ------------------- Reason ------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found.
