On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:45:42PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:45:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Package: avahi
> > particularly languages that are apparently in a state of flux, is not
> > robust.  If the libavahi-cil bindings are needed in Debian (they don't have
> > any reverse-dependencies), please consider moving them to their own source
> > package.

> banshee-daap uses libavahi1.0-cil. So yes it's actually used. 

Aha, I see; I didn't check unstable for reverse-dependencies.

> I'll look into making avahi nicer for you guys.  With some luck i can 
> persuade 
> upstream to split up into different tarballs.

That would be very much appreciated. :)

I'm still chasing down a few more packages for the mysql transition (mostly
packages that aren't binNMU-safe), so it will still be a couple of days
before this goes into testing.  If you do split the source packages, please
hold off on re-uploading the C/C++ libs until you see that the current
version has reached testing.  The C# bindings could be uploaded at any time
without affecting the transition.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to