Quoting Lev Lamberov (2020-04-30 14:40:53) > Чт 30 апр 2020 @ 14:06 Jan Wielemaker <j.wielema...@vu.nl>: > > > On 4/30/20 1:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> I think we can use the format almost as-is - just replacing the > >> leading "swipl-" with "swi-prolog-abi-". > > > > I think adding "abi" makes sense. I can replace "swipl" with the > > package name, which is "swi-prolog" for Debian. > > I'm thinking about something like as follows: > > Provides: swi-prolog-abi-$(swipl:ABI) > > where $(swipl:ABI) will be set in d/rules in override_dh_gencontrol > target, so actually it doesn't matter what is the original output of > swipl --abi_version, since we have sed and other tools to make it as > we like. What do you think, Jonas?
I agree with Lev. That is what I tried to say above as well (that we can _take_ it as-is and will need to massage it only slightly), but I see now that it can just as easily be read as meaning the opposite (that we would need a slightly different format). So to (try) clarify: I think it is *perfect* usable for Debian that upstream code emits "swipl-2-67-792e14f8-de23899e" when asked for its ABI. Sorry for the confusion. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
