Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 15:52 +0000, Mo Zhou wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 03:25:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 05:21 +0000, Mo Zhou wrote: > > > The whole fix involes two parts: a part goes to src:zfs-linux and > > > the > > > other goes to src:spl-linux. Now that the updated src:spl-linux > > > is > > > already uploaded, and I'm now asking for the permission to upload > > > the > > > updated src:zfs-linux. Which includes two upstream commits fixing > > > potential deadlock issues. > > > > What happens if a user tries using the current spl-dkms with the > > newer > > zfs-dkms, or vice versa? > > I forgot to add Depends: spl-dkms (>= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, s-p-u) into > the debdiff of zfs-linux.
OK. With that change included, please feel free to go ahead. > Actually zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, buster) have no problem to > build atop spl-linux (= 0.7.12-2, buster) or (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, s- > p-u); while zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u2, s-p-u) will FTBFS atop > spl-linux (= 0.7.12-2, buster) > So it's fine to accept spl-linux now, without causing any issues? Regards, Adam
