Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Bernd,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:37:45PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > I have a bit complicated idea for a buster-pu: ceph. > Buster shipped with 12.2.11 and last April upstream released 12.2.12 as > bugfix release. As usual with ceph, the diff is *huge*, but it is a > bugfix-only release. So here are a few facts: > > - upstream changes: https://ceph.io/releases/v12-2-12-luminous-released/ > > - proposed diff: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/compare/luminous%2Funstable...debian%2Fbuster > That's kind of unreadable. We like to have the proposed diff directly in the p-u bug, along with a description of the changes, what they fix, what the risks are. Pointers to more information elsewhere are not bad, but they don't replace information that should be in the bug. In this case the upstream changelog doesn't really provide much context on which if any of the fixed issues are serious enough for us to want the update in stable. > - I've basically imported the changes the Ubuntu people have done in > Ubuntu together with 12.2.12. So I assume this should work well, I did > not yet test it properly as I want to wait for a reply from you. I'll > prepare a backport of 14.2.x as soon as it migrates to testing anyway. > A reply from us tends to not be forthcoming before the proposed changes have been tested, so there's a bit of a chicken and egg issue. > - The issue with ceph is that upstream doesn't do QA for 32bit and our > selection of unusual architectures. I don't know if it builds on all > buildds without trying... > There should be porterboxes available for all our release architectures. Cheers, Julien
