On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > fq_codel is better in every way than pfifo_fast and I am unaware of any > reason why it would not be a better default. (but don't trust me, ask the > kernel networking experts)
Isn't CAKE supposed to be even better than fq_codel, including better handling of both large numbers of flows (e.g. busy routers) and small systems with limited resources. https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake/ If we consider a change (which I think we should), is there a reason we wouldn't go with CAKE? noah
