On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:41:00 +0000 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:25:23 -0400 Holger Levsen <hol...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Package: dh-systemd
> > Version: 10.2.5, 10.7.2
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > Please drop transitional package dh-systemd for Buster, as it has been 
> > released with stretch.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > -- 
> > cheers,
> >     Holger
> 
> 
> There are currently 400 source pacakges still building on it in
> unstable, so it is not plausible to do atm.

According to dak, we are down to 51 packages:

aptitude-robot: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
argus: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
at: dh-systemd
bit-babbler: dh-systemd
bitlbee: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
bootcd: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
carbon-c-relay: dh-systemd
cgmanager: dh-systemd
console-setup: dh-systemd
denyhosts: dh-systemd (>= 1.3)
fake-hwclock: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
hdapsd: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
i8kutils: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
ifscheme: dh-systemd
ircd-irc2: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
isatapd: dh-systemd
ksmtuned: dh-systemd
lockdown: dh-systemd
lsm: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
lxdm: dh-systemd
memlockd: dh-systemd (>= 1.4)
mod-gearman: dh-systemd (>= 1.4)
netatalk: dh-systemd
niceshaper: dh-systemd
numad: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
nvi: dh-systemd
nyancat: dh-systemd
onak: dh-systemd
open-iscsi: dh-systemd
open-isns: dh-systemd
opensips: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
php7.4: dh-systemd (>= 1.3)
pmacct: dh-systemd
pppconfig: dh-systemd (>= 1.6)
prads: dh-systemd
prometheus-pgbouncer-exporter: dh-systemd
sanlock: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
schroot: dh-systemd
sec: dh-systemd
slim: dh-systemd
spacenavd: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
tcpcrypt: dh-systemd
thinkfan: dh-systemd (>= 1.3)
tor: dh-systemd
triggerhappy: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
twms: dh-systemd
udevil: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
waagent: dh-systemd
watchdog: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)
xorp: dh-systemd
yrmcds: dh-systemd (>= 1.5)

Wdyt, should I do a MBF (severity important, properly usertagged)?
This list looks rather manageable to me that we might even get rid of it
for bullseye. I'd review the list in a couple of months and possibly
raise the bugs to RC once the package is dropped (or would you consider
that too "pushy"?)

Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to