I don't think this is a moderation-specific problem, as I've had it on
-backports: see below, "From cmake information".
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: DMARC fail on non-spam - is this a lists.d.o bug?
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 17:36:58 +0000
From: Rebecca N. Palmer <rebecca_pal...@zoho.com>
To: listmas...@lists.debian.org
The (non-spam) message
https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2020/02/msg00010.html was
"rejected per DMARC policy for yahoo.com" by my email provider. (Their
settings don't appear to have a way to disable this filtering: the spam
filters I do control are already either off or
accept-and-place-in-junk-folder.)
Was the signature broken by a bug in lists.d.o (it shouldn't be, as
#752084 is closed as fixed), or was it invalid to begin with?
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:45:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: Debian Listmaster Team <listmas...@lists.debian.org>
Reply-To: listmas...@lists.debian.org
To: rebecca_pal...@zoho.com
Dear subscriber,
We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your
emailaddress rebecca_pal...@zoho.com.
In the last seven days we've seen bounces for the following list:
* debian-backports
1 bounce out of 15 mails in 30 days (6%, kick-score is 80%)
(https://lists.debian.org/bounces/WTET4qYN3Hfeqy4ZAtgWDQ)
(The link above points to a copy of the latest bounce
and will be valid for seven days.)
If the bounce-rate passes the kick-score, our bounce-detection will forcibly
remove your subscription.
Bounces happen from time to time when spam slips through our filters but are
rejected by your mail provider. If you are your own mail provider and use
'Before-Queue Content filtering', you should whitelist bendel.debian.org
from
Content filtering.
However: You can safely ignore this message (and you will not be
unsubscribed
:-) ) if your bounce rate remains low.
For more information see https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/FAQ
You are welcome to contact listmas...@lists.debian.org if you think this
message was sent in error.
Sincerely,
The Listmaster Team
--
http://lists.debian.org
That link contains:
From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Feb 20 03:33:06 2020
Return-Path: <>
X-Original-To:
bounce-debian-backports=rebecca_palmer=zoho....@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To:
lists-bounce-debian-backports=rebecca_palmer=zoho....@bendel.debian.org
Received: by bendel.debian.org (Postfix)
id 2C0CE204C8; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: mailer-dae...@bendel.debian.org (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: bounce-debian-backports=rebecca_palmer=zoho....@lists.debian.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="B172C20236.1582169585/bendel.debian.org"
Message-Id: <20200220033305.2c0ce20...@bendel.debian.org>
This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
--B172C20236.1582169585/bendel.debian.org
Content-Description: Notification
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This is the mail system at host bendel.debian.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<rebecca_pal...@zoho.com>: host smtpin.zoho.com[136.143.190.120] said: 550
5.7.1 Email rejected per DMARC policy for yahoo.com (in reply to end of
DATA command)
--B172C20236.1582169585/bendel.debian.org
Content-Description: Delivery report
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: B172C20236
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; bounce-debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org
Arrival-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; rebecca_pal...@zoho.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;rebecca_pal...@zoho.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Remote-MTA: dns; smtpin.zoho.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Email rejected per DMARC policy for
yahoo.com
--B172C20236.1582169585/bendel.debian.org
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <bounce-debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id B172C20236; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-backports-requ...@lists.debian.org Thu Feb
20 03:30:11 2020
Old-Return-Path: <cyberman_phill...@yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on bendel.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.2
X-Original-To: lists-debian-backpo...@bendel.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-backpo...@bendel.debian.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF24B2027A
for <lists-debian-backpo...@bendel.debian.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020
03:12:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-lt
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=1.801 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id sQ_7eLW-ojef
for <lists-debian-backpo...@bendel.debian.org>;
Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:12:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2
(check from: .yahoo. - helo: .sonic312-22.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo. -
helo-domain: .yahoo.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
Received: from sonic312-22.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com
(sonic312-22.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.128.84])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988CB2044A
for <debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:10:20
+0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com;
s=s2048; t=1582168217; bh=P4inaw+jwNy1PZRNQ/e5iYeXXg4HWzwN4xfHW8B71M0=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject;
b=uNxzDX3LlHF8OTqjmZzUMOFzB3yhRB6Q2rUQ8XSEND4bQM+EXYPSy/4w5p1Y27xSrUXp68aJ99M7sdzOauTX8dkd36mUoV5AW6KZ9XHVH9UGHiDBjyqTpp2sIm1uMfaPnMT2oLqNyyqnF06SQJZvuIwhv+i/u0mKpzN1SMlu5S0J99HKRtzEsXpL6BG/uNLwhyBdb/UZKs7Db1T4Nl91EJGyGkAzLxDiY3GyN9+BEImzHmrv34WUWADMdwcMqZxLM3j+m5UtRoebtwKrHbqMLHjtEzt8oAXTkogyPpFQU89LaAwhMwoxek3yboNymafS+YYChYIr80plN4A4hiQLsw==
X-YMail-OSG: uHdaGh4VM1kgsUmlaWQsqsNDdibOQdKPBibYqLkMrEiWB99mYb23ZnDze9ha4mv
KbAqcyoSMlunnLJKIuySy71S3zzEpXhhX.de6riLWlOWgy9Dj6j2GyKFwgvOWJKBDM42xr7R7Api
buMCgItmpqMfduCIN416Rzz4.LuQjW453hAfmkGGF3V8hGx8iwFT6Oa2s7nMxh6c11_R4A11zMut
fsGStiJGd15SK0VHnd6C8XfnTqc71VaMASHITchhqlWf27ZTb4hHdUZkXBDQHzRTC8lUY17yhIIt
A7t.vrb1w5VLtEIEb1j914e1PZ.BkzYaQ7jLNVnlgQ94IonvYEuyB__SgNrkIXZqVGbocT3KEm3q
3WVKu0iMgD64Ydh7hmGdvtK886luOQown09uuVLqeq6gNxARz73.Gv41_CSoUV89i_h1mPWoqFRf
YnxJgOUVMSVDm2J0qEMr_wz_nxyAg_sTe0v23BC08CNL0YuzgiiMuqbsVE7zHma6_cvZO5ZYy4kn
wkaUvC0vUl1tk3mhcbPEaakmScfdLeDCDImuMpJtOmbwlUuHqpxBoH9dUTTTLsEoRj5cpSqHryoi
gHcZvzu2rlZjPciFlgERPBWbTNQYR61LU.C163N9_me5ZLbrd4WP7DhPhgeoqHvKlS_d0HoDtc3t
GhFVixKopAcCYXrAhvKkBWmy16NhIuPTboB6T6yuRM4UAjCxFxqaosomouQYLEII27kq2_LwOucd
ZJ9VHH2z40pbNXCPXoWhXZfzbJ42h4wB107zHmCqC7pGyvRa4PzylwPc20nqNeaJGnu7fLJVcGP5
R_hFJxX9Tjxhdh0HmBl41yUP.WpH_J7jvO4xmPbjGEVsQX9CWI8pFQ0RCuVhg93gEsX55dCWi7xu
xaKd2SRxugacpbb0LmlCtTwNwjY93toxwVwxMgXi0tFE5qkbj8jNs6RLer0lEAWFfpTc1AkbFhxP
d6hJCU9a_1XHZvz3186irpCwuYb4b8N3lrnSey0CAO.GrbaEsFrgpfNU7SpM9hViP0hRfBAzkIea
WzmomWf_9SBNcaymB8SzoWTRCgb7VTabL0BaQSDP6pmWQ_T6bh8qbFQvVEnb6KAgyALug3db98MO
33IwV0breYXlFUkvVhQGf3_3o6L3j0EfAn07iNJRtCVBMmHrgShP13uKrAKo2mETTROJadAZ0xFu
Ye_nl.tB2C4M9U3.bmImO6yS4.hohzozcMAbooC6TIfL1y4mhHPs4bPaXslcRj8eDk.HY4YQe.To
qA3SJbIHO4dalFDCiMG.fPok2wHBGFjWpqqBUiqBv7v9023S0V6sctm81czdWONIRuOk-
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by
sonic312.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:10:17
+0000
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Stephen R Phillips <cyberman_phill...@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Stephen R Phillips <cyberman_phill...@yahoo.com>
To: debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org
Message-ID: <1132934662.3976002.1582168182...@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Regarding cmake version
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_3976001_1565340796.1582168182033"
References: <1132934662.3976002.1582168182034....@mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.15199 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux
x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <pbniU37zhYD.A.Q5F.D1fTeB@bendel>
Resent-From: debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/8737
X-Loop: debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-backports.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-backports-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-backports-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-backports-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-backports-requ...@lists.debian.org
List-Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1132934662.3976002.1582168182...@mail.yahoo.com
Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
------=_Part_3976001_1565340796.1582168182033
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Current cmake in debian is 3.13.4
From cmake information the following can be derived.3.16.4 is the last
set of
revisions:https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.16/release/3.16.html3.15.4 is
a bit more (seasoned with bug fixes from 3.13 and 3.14) and may be a
good candidate for at least a
backport:https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.15/release/3.15.html
As KitWare does NOT time stamp their revisions (slightly frustrating)
it's hard to say how old what revision is, however 3.13.4 says somewhere
2015.
I am aware that TRYING to install cmake from scratch on debian doesn't
work (having tried and failed). So I don't have the same option as I did
with KiCAD.
------=_Part_3976001_1565340796.1582168182033
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head></head><body><div class=3D"yahoo-style-wrap" style=3D"font-fami=
ly:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div dir=
=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false"><div>Current cmake in debian is 3.13.4<br></=
div><div>From cmake information the following can be derived.</div><div dir=
=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false">3.16.4 is the last set of revisions:</div><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false"><span class=3D"ydp3b9449e0pasted-link"=
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.16/release/3.16.html</span></div><div dir=
=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false">3.15.4 is a bit more (seasoned with bug fixe=
s from 3.13 and 3.14) and may be a good candidate for at least a backport:<=
/div><div dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false"><span class=3D"ydpda14a5c6paste=
d-link">https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.15/release/3.15.html</span></div><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=
=3D"false">As KitWare does NOT time stamp their revisions (slightly frustra=
ting) it's hard to say how old what revision is, however 3.13.4 says somewh=
ere 2015.<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false"><br></div><div di=
r=3D"ltr" data-setdir=3D"false">I am aware that TRYING to install cmake fro=
m scratch on debian doesn't work (having tried and failed). So I don't have=
the same option as I did with KiCAD.<br></div></div></div></body></html>
------=_Part_3976001_1565340796.1582168182033--
--B172C20236.1582169585/bendel.debian.org--
