Hi, On 2020-04-02 12:10, Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: retitle -1 Enable seccomp support on riscv64 > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > Hi Aurelien, > > I decided to disable seccomp support again for riscv64 for the time > being. This will make backports easier. > Once we have a libseccomp in stable which does have support for riscv64, > I'll re-enable support for it (which means bullseye+1), I'll re-enable > support. Retitling the bug report accordingly.
Thanks, that make sense and will avoid to have to clutter the upstream patch with #ifdef. There is no urgency in getting libseccomp support on in systemd for riscv64, my goal was mostly to fix the FTBFS. At least we learned that it works, or rather that it is not completely broken. > By then, we should have an official libseccomp release with riscv64 > support and your patch might have a chance to be applied upstream. libseccomp releases are not really predictable, but it seems there are currently people working towards a release, so it might happens in the next months. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
