Package: src:notmuch Followup-For: Bug #950729 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
I ran two builds and both succeeded. I wonder if this FTBFS is still valid. Regards, Daniel - -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEvu1N7VVEpMA+KD3HS80FZ8KW0F0FAl59Z/0ACgkQS80FZ8KW 0F11vQ/6A2PluEdJThrmzqg1LTpZ2CIjMPyGvVxT3SKGPiB+79WLQdXiKgRrlfXG pDGDGB9EAVhJ8o+9KOVlzL+isdfZ0KJghOuSdTftmoyRYZsUyasZMG4H9mshocwG EB7RcLkshIS8TngTb3Wm2RHnFxmHXUqxfmd9arkzUfvu/ObtvhKocdivERmQxbYl CLxJlz/khwv1xY2JcboxyhY7WjbpcWST4W+9KkQlLR+FDzfMhMAa9PAciqJPJugD JHMvM+YYuex/EIwXqkciWcxK3mzZMmkh6oHzrCYO3QB/H9XJ3Lnm+LkoqNx+Ob7x XPW/75whPHDoGG/rdgaHWvAwMPwVAoOJ1dipJKMQdRDSuQhsUXwYQSfjjMwYHpMS BpBMc5ROFayU7df4MpbtEsbt0h5XvA1w182oeLkgOxhBHUI/o2fl/iA7osHwSfdP RCoa0RGBqWnwkhbaJO2zyp8+QeB4zt9cogTI8oMTcxsow1wi4Dox23ldA1AR26H4 dMAkCoHoub/6wyZzBOIDnuYb1aqEncJt++t4ERM4znXWof4gJenrhp20/Z/CkZHV SdF7iBCx+p4ardSE70oA3AE+vkL+mh3/mCSBIRyy/nUF/X/FoLbLjdv31aIUo7fz JV87bDMV4mbYJWqe57SbRgZ79H3BJUCgDR4nLLVtT2eP0/8GHyA= =OUVM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
